Free interactive commenting by www.SquawkBox.tv - click to sign-up!
I'm Chuck Tryon and I'll probably spend a lot of time writing about popular culture, since I teach cultural studies at Georgia Tech. I may also spend a lot of time writing about politics, since I have an overdeveloped sense of righteous indignation. We'll see how it goes.

Listening:
Sparklehorse
White Stripes
Vic Chesnutt
Johnny Cash
drivin' n' cryin'

























 
Archives
<< current













 
Email Chuck Tryon
My Home Page

Weblogs:
p ? Atlanta Blogs # n

Listed on BlogShares

Chuck/Male/31-35. Lives in United States/Georgia/Atlanta, speaks English. Eye color is blue. My interests are film/literature.
This is my blogchalk:
United States, Georgia, Atlanta, English, Chuck, Male, 31-35, film, literature.
























the chutry experiment
 
Sunday, November 16, 2003  
A Better World Through Blogging
Like almost everyone else, I've been thinking about submitting to the CFP on blogging (now that the deadline is fast approaching).

Right now, I'm intrigued by questions about the social and political effects of blogging. Anne Galloway has linked to Adam Greenfield's pessimistic reflection on whether or not IT have made the world a better place. He challenges readers to answer the following questions:


Is the planet as a whole detectably better-off in the wake of a decade of decentralized, low-cost-of-entry information availability? Are we better informed, less superstitious, more open-minded, more curious, stronger, less afraid? Do we make better choices?
My initial response is a slightly ambiguous yes. I'll grant that corporations are getting richer and fatter. I'll admit that the current global tensions have produced an increase in superstition and nationalism. But I do think the grassroots possibilities of IT, including blogs, have at least kept some of our bullies at bay (the "Star Wars Kid" is one example). Even though the FCC voted for deregulation, public outcry has encouraged Congress to consider repealing the FCC's decision. Blogs and online news sources have helped disseminate information that mainstream news sources have either buried or distorted.

This isn't the question I really wanted to address here. I'm still trying to think about the temporal linearity of the blog and how that informs the way we "think through" blogs. It does seem to privilege the ephemeral, the right now, over the eternal, the past. One of the results is the number of political bloggers (of all positions). I know that part of my attraction to the blogosphere was reading Salam Pax and others who were blogging about Iraq. I don't think that all blogs or bloggers privilege immediacy over the long-term (Matt's discussion of the digital archive is one example), but I'm fascinated by the temporal construction of blogs. I'm just not sure where to go with it.

Posted by chuck at 01:31 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

8:01 PM

 
Turning Tables
In the original incarnation of the chutry experiment, I reflected (scroll down to March 16 and 17) on what I found to be a fascinating use of blogs, the first hand accounts from journalists, soldiers, and civilians on the war in Iraq, the most famous of which is, of course, Salam Pax. I was struck by the fact that the immediate publication associated with blogging seemed perfectly fit to the immediacy of first-person narratives about the war. I'm less wide-eyed about the medium now, but I have recently come across a blog published by a U.S. soldier that struck me as particularly fascinating. The soldier, who publishes under the identity "moja," is frequently critical of U.S. policy and in many of his posts carefully weighs the consequences of our actions in Iraq, while often expressing sympathy with the Iraqi citizens (including Salam Pax). Perhpas most interesting is his reflection on what is permissible for him to say, a question that comes across in an exchange with an ex-Navy Seal. Moja writes that the ex-Seal


feels that as a soldier i should keep quite about all of my political beliefs...i, as a soldier, feel that i do have the right of free speech with in the realm of the army...there are things that i can not speak about...my chain of command...the president...their decisions...and the like...
These questions frequently come to the surface in Moja's blog, and through his ambivalence about U.S. policy, he provides an intriguing perspective on the situation in Iraq. As with other "front bloggers" (I prefer that term to "warbloggers"), there has been some debate about the authenticity of <...turning tables...>, but it's still an interesting read.

Posted by chuck at 01:16 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

8:00 PM

 
Happy Endings and Afterimages
I'm still thinking about issues pertaining to the temporality of blogging and had the good fortune of coming across an interesting definition via Jill's blog: In weezBlog, Elouise Oyzon writes,


Blogs are a first person narrative in real time.

Can't wait to see how mine turns out. I do so hope it has a happy ending. Don't we all?

I certainly like this definition and the way in which it plays with the two forms of immediacy (personal and temporal) associated with blogging. There's an interesting wrinkle or two here, one that I keep trying to grasp. First, I'm struck by Elouise's mention of the much desired "happy ending." Much of the writing I do (I won't speak for anyone else) anticipates certain conclusions (finishing an article or book, securing a happy relationship, getting a tenure-track job), some of which--of course--entail new beginnings. Then again, as Margaret Atwood reminds us, there's really only one way of ending a story. But this sense of anticipation seems structurally crucial to my blogging, and may be relevant to others.

I'm also working through some of the contradictions raised by the attempt to capture "real time," the temporal immeidacy of blogging, and the project of the archive. In Mary Ann Doane's latest book, she comments on the tension in recent technologies of representation between the desire for immediacy and the wish to archive. Doane comments that


"The obsession with instantaneity and the instant ... leads to the contradictory desire of archiving presence. For what is archivable loses its presence, becomes immediately the past" (82).
In this sense, I'd like to add to the notion of blogs as "first person narrations in real time" the concept of the after-image, where what appears to be instantaneous, present, might actually be marked (perhaps usefully) by delay.

There is certainly something imprecise about imposing a visual metaphor onto the textual medium of blogging, but in a strange way, I think it fits. Both film (in its original form) and blogging are characterized by similar desires--the desire to produce a stable representation of the present. Both are characterized by their sequential structure, although film's sequentiality (24 frames per second) is much more structured than the blogger's. And, of course, blogging is much more explicitly characterized by a subjective frame of reference than the motion picture camera, which advertised itself as an objective image of reality. Hmmm....I still have lots to think about here.

Posted by chuck at July 30, 2003 03:08 PM | TrackBack

Comments





After-image, and archive become physical memory. All moments past, are the context/the environment for the present. One need not have them forefront in the present moment (this particular frame or blog entry), though they do provide the context and inform the present if you have the key.

Anyhoo- nice to visit these thoughts before midnight. Thanks.



Posted by: elouise at July 30, 2003 04:07 PM |

Permalink to Comment







Maybe I was taking the term "real time" a little too literally before. Still, the point I'm intrigued by is the fact that both blogs and films engage this intersection between sequentiality and the archive in complicated ways.

Also, I found it kinda cool that the thoughts you post at midnight were time-stamped at 4PM....



Posted by: chuck at July 31, 2003 11:52 AM |

Permalink to Comment







further complicating the issue- the notion of the present depends upon where the reader enters the stream. Whatever the current entry is, becomes a frame of reference. Depending upon linkages, for example, entering the blog via a category sort, the sequence is no longer necessarily chronological. So unlike film, the story had a non-linearity.

BTW what do you teach? Although I am a professor of information technology, my background is in the fine arts - animation, and printmaking.

as to the time shift - that's just freaky



Posted by: Elouise at July 31, 2003 05:57 PM |

Permalink to Comment







Good point...I liked the observations you made on your blog about how the various possible reference points in a given narrative--in this case a blog--will inform interpretation.

I can imagine some alternatives for film: perhaps an alternate-reality film with bifurcating timelines, a character either catches or misses a train, and based on that, her world changes dramatically.

The other alternative, and a better one, would be a film on a perpetual loop. Your interpretation of the events on the film change depending on when you walk into the room.

I teach freshman composition with an emphasis on digital studies, but my dissertation is on film, and that's what I'd like to teach most.



Posted by: chuck at July 31, 2003 09:32 PM |

Permalink to Comment







Nice. I like the notion of loop. It'd be an interesting piece.

Given digital capabilities, a series of scenes could be played in random order. Perhaps watching the audience order the events would be informative by itself - what shakes out as preferred resolution?



Posted by: elouise at August 1, 2003 08:26 AM |

Permalink to Comment







I like both--each can do interesting things. There's an interactive film, Tender Loving Care, that allows teh audience to make certain choices, often with unexpected results. The film is narrated by a psychologist character (played by John Hurt) who analyzes your choices.

The random loop, of course, takes more control away from the viewer of the film in the presentation of the film, but the viewer might compensate for that in her interpretive work. Or it could be just a total jumble.



Posted by: chuck at August 1, 2003 12:58 PM |


7:56 PM

 
September 07, 2003
"Blogging and the Everyday" Paper Notes
A few disorganized thoughts: Like mcb, I'm working on my article for Into the Blogosphere. Because of my research on cinematic time, I became intrigued by the relationship between blogging and time, especially the ways in which blogs are used to assimilate our experiences. I'm still struggling with a number of difficulties, including the very pertinent question of determining which blogs will be the object of my study. Right now, my tendency is not to focus on a single blog (which seems reductive), but to perhaps focus instead on what I might call the "immediacy meme" that has been floating among the Wordherders and friends for some time. By focusing on a "meme" rather than a single blog, I think I will better illustrate the importance of hyperlinking to the development of concepts within blogging communities (but I'm not sure about that).

When I borrowed (stole?) George's description of blogs as "writing to the moment," I was intrigued by the complicated temporal relationship he was describing between immediate experience and assimilated experience. George is, of course, writing about blogs that have a biographical quality to them and asks,


In what narrative do we imagine we're participating? How does the importance of previous events change as later events occur?
Bloggers don't know how their narratives will turn out; therefore, when I write about this article, about my teaching, I do so without knowing how those narratives will resolve themselves. A second complication: from which point can the author/the reader make that determination? Now that I have written about my course blog's unexpected publicity, at what point does that narrative end? At the end of the semester? After I've (hopefully) earned a tenure-track teaching job? At the end of my career? Even later than that? I know these questions about deferred meanings have been around for a long time, but I think blogs raise the stakes in an intriguing way.

Of course as Dave reminds us, this concept of immediacy is itself something of an illusion, in part because these representations of experience are always mediated, in part by the technology itself, and Dave's discussion of blogs as a form of life-writing are far more developed than my own.

There is something about this illusion of immediacy that seems to speak to the social role that blogs seem to have served, especially here in the US. It's my understanding (and maybe others can back me up on this) that blogs gained a boost of popularity in the aftermath of September 11, with the traumatic experiences of that day finding their articulation in part through a medium that lends itself to very immediate personal reflections.

Certainly my interest in blogging as a medium was piqued by their use in articulating first-person accounts of the war in Iraq. The first person narratives of the war, particularly the observations of Salam Pax, were more powerful because of the appearance of immediacy that blogging provides. In fact, the treatment of Salam's blog in the press and in other blogs points to this desire for more authentic representations. But now I'm beginning to feel my definition of "immediacy" slipping away....Against what inauthentic representation am I now defining immediacy? Against mainstream media representations? Against all other mediation? How does one define "immediacy" in the first place when there are so many registers available? Can "immediacy" be defined without some opposite ("culture" to Derrida's "nature") to make it visible?

Final aside: Why not write on weblog narratives about the war?


Posted by chuck at September 7, 2003 02:35 PM | TrackBack


7:53 PM

 
September 27, 2003
Myopia, or Writing and Everyday Life
One of my favorite things about blogging is that whenever my thinking feels stalled or when I become too caught up in the frustrations of everyday life, I know that I can rely on one of my fellow bloggers to provide the spark that re-energizes my thinking. One of the blogs I visit regularly to get my focus back is weezBlog, and her most recent entry on blogs as first-person narratives articulates something that had been eluding me. She writes:


The sad thing about a real time narrative is that one cannot skip the boring bits, or jump to the denouement...at least the unfortunate protagonist can't.

Someone else may pick up the thread after the fact and sagely nod their head and say, "Yup. Saw that coming in post number 58. C'mon, you couldn't figure it out by 107?"

We're kind of myopic here, us real-time characters. Doing the sling and arrows thing. Sponges of outrageous fortune. (I do wish the omniscient one could give a clue sometimes, tell me that the outcome will be just fine...just wait a few turns, and all the disparate threads will resolve themselves).

I like the idea of connecting myopia to the everyday--that we can't see far enough ahead to know where our stories will go. Last week, when I was in the middle of my grading marathon, I could barely see beyond the stack of papers in front of me; grading (especially when you have 75 students who all deserve for their papers to receive careful attention) requires a tremendous amount of energy and leaves me with little time for reflection. I couldn't fast-forward to the "more interesting" stuff, whatever that will be, even if I wanted to.

Now I'm in the process of putting together applications for tenure-track jobs (revising my job letter and dissertation abstract, that sort of thing), and that feels like a different kind of vision. I still can't see too far ahead (who knows where my current road will take me?), but I'm having a difficult time concentrating on anything nearby, too. To extend the vision metaphor, maybe it's a bit like hyperopia (seeing things far away, but not up close) in that I'm barely able to absorb what is taking place around me, leaving me to feel my way through a day's events. Or maybe things are moving so fast right now that my vision is blurred a little.

Or maybe I'm concentrating on all the wrong narratives....S and I watched Lost in Translation (IMDB) last night, and we both really liked it. The film focuses on Bob (Bill Murray), a washed up actor filming commercials in Japan, and Charlotte (Scarlet Johansson), a recent philosophy graduate traveling in Japan with her photographer husband. Because they are both facing some uncertainties about their direction in lfe, the two of them develop an interesting friendship. In ways, it really captures this sense of boredom and frustration, the feeling of not knowing where your story is going to go. I'm still sorting through the film, and I may be too scattered to write a full blown entry about it, but it's definitely well worth seeing.

Posted by chuck at September 27, 2003 09:49 PM | TrackBack

Comments





I liked that movie too.



Posted by: v+ at September 28, 2003 06:59 PM |

Permalink to Comment







"Translation" is really sticking with me. It really captures well that sense of lives in transition.



Posted by: chuck at September 29, 2003 01:07 AM |

Permalink to Comment







Chuck,

Your use of hyperopia (seeing things far away, but not up close) made me do a bit of dictionary searching. I always thought the antonym of myopia was presbyopia. There seems to be an intrigute nuance between them. Haven't quite been able to sharpen the focus on what that nuance might be.






Posted by: Francois Lachance at September 29, 2003 10:33 AM |

Permalink to Comment







I got my term from a thesaurus, so yours is probably more accurate. Hyperopia didn't quite sound right. Now, even though my terminological error was an accident, the big question is: how to make sense of the distinction.



Posted by: chuck at September 29, 2003 11:23 AM |

7:50 PM

 
September 30, 2003
Television and Duration
I'm still reading Margaret Morse and thinking about the blogging and the everyday paper. In her discussion of nonplaces, Morse discusses television, specifically Raymond Williams' understanding of television as "flow" (although she articulates her understanding of "flow" against his) as "the pure juxtaposition of unrelated segments" (229). As Morse explains flow, it seems like there is a similar process going on within blogs (or blogspace). There are two major similarities that I can recognize:


The relationship of unrelated elements within blogs: Even though I have been using this blog primarily for research, I also write movie reviews, discuss my teaching, and dabble in politics, but I'm guessing that most blog readers don't read my blog from beginning to end.

The relationship of unrelated elements between blogs: Like a television remote control, blogrolls, almost invariably navigated by clicking (a mouse instead of a remote), allow a viewer to bring together disparate elements.

I'm not sure how this connects to my notion of the everyday, but I think there is a relationship between blogging and television that can be triangulated through how the two mediums construct time. I'm also trying to wrap my head around the connection to "nonplaces" and the suggestion that television offers a "derealized" space, in part because it depends on a notion of "real" space that I find difficult to define.

I'm still thinking about the "media and democracy" points, too, especially in light of the ways in which blogging has functioned as an "alternative" media during the war and the recent allegations regarding the "outed" CIA agent.

More on that later, but now I'm going to take a break and watch my beloved Braves beat the Cubs.

Posted by chuck at September 30, 2003 09:24 PM | TrackBack

Comments





Safari just quit in the middle of a long post--ESPN's MLB GameCast crashed it--as I was rubbing in Kerry Wood's double.*

Anyway, my point--now much truncated--was simply that re: your second point, interblog navigation is far more structured than using a television remote. A TV remote shifts between shows that have no relation other than they are both on at the same time. But in a blog, you're typically either following a link in a post or a blogroll, so there's some articulation of the two sites (linker/linkee). You can of course eventually produce disparate or unrelated elements, but the initial relation is stronger.

*I lived 3 blocks east of Wrigley during Kerry Wood's rookie year, at a time when there wasn't a whole lot else to look forward to about the Cubs. His starts were electrifying.



Posted by: Jason at September 30, 2003 10:17 PM |

Permalink to Comment







I posted this entry just minutes before that double. These Cubs are starting to remind me of the 1991 Braves, with their amazing young pitching staff (I remember a game where Wood struck out something like 18 Braves players)....

I think you're right about that distinction and knew that interblog navigation can be a bit more structured (the links are often explicitly connected). TV isn't completely disparate, though, because the TV viewer will usually know something about the channels and programming schedules she surfs (even if she has satellite TV).

I'd also add that even though I know roughly what I can expect on the various blogs I watch, the entries are still partial and fragmentary, sometimes unpredictable. But, yeah, the analogy is more nuanced than my original entry suggested.



Posted by: chuck at September 30, 2003 10:34 PM |

Permalink to Comment







Nice splicing of baseball and the TV-blogging comparision.

How often does the viewer "write to" television?

Even with blogs that don't accomodate a commentary mechanism, the surfer can turn writer and record a linking. One, of course, can write about television and even refer to a specific broadcast. Retrieval of the referenced work has an impact on the sense of time and immediacy. Obviously, the social construction of the archive is factor in the rereading of blogs just as it is with television shows.

The blogsphere has a broadcast stream and an archive. Hence the various types of splicing or linking: the triangulation offered by Jason and chuck with the ball game and their learned discussion on temporality and blogging; the link offered by chuck to the work of Margaret Morse.

Recapture of the record. Blogging as sieve. Two directional: from broadcast stream to archive and from archive to broadcast.

What a catch by the batter! What a run by the pitcher!



Posted by: Francois Lachance at October 1, 2003 11:52 AM |

Permalink to Comment







The communication between TV and viewer is almost completely one-way while blogging usually two-way. I suppose one could consider channel surfing as a kind of "writing" in that viewers who don't like a certain program can change the channel or can rewrite a narrative by watching only part of it (such as Native Americans who change the channel halfway through a Western, before the heroic white man comes to save the day).

One of the riteria here might be that writing "to" or "in" television would require that you write in the same medium (TV) rather than in print; otherwise it's something else, it's writing "on" TV. Perhaps Tivo and VCRs are other technologies for writing "to" TV.

I think this is why Blogathon interested me so much: publishing entries every half hour seemed awfully close to a simulation of the temporality of the broadcast with its clearly identified intervals.



Posted by: chuck at October 1, 2003 12:20 PM |

Permalink to Comment







Allow me to finesse my point about the two-way sieve. The temporality broadcasting and a regular publishing schedule are alike in that they involve transmission at regular intervals. The way that copying technologies have been deployed and regulated affects how in the social imaginary the semantics of "circulation" get mapped to the products of television. To place into circulation and to broadcast are similar gestures.

The dyanmics of reception, production and translation at at work no matter where the critic/theorist begins: writing as the performative and recording the writing. The on/to distinction doesn't quite work for mean. Even before the advent of multimedia, the written word could be voiced and the recited word recorded as a transcription. Such possibilities are inherent to how most natural languages operate in a combo of visual and auditory sensory modes.

Cultural artefacts are multi-temporal because human beings possess the ability to process their environments and themselves in multimodal sensory fashion. Human attention is directed, diverted and enticed. And that has less to do with the medium per se and more to do with social contexts and learnt behaviour that give rise to the habits of consumption, translation and reception.

Blogging has shown lots of people that they push, pull and splice. So has the rip, mix, burn experience of sampling and generalized access to digital recording technology.

It is perhaps difficult to imagine a world of readers who cannot write. It is easier to imagine a world where a shortage of writing supplies affects the numbers of readers who can write. It was not always where the "everyday" including the pen and paper pad in almost every household.

On a tangent, you might want to take a look at Elouise's blog entry on "praise".
http://www.rit.edu/~eroics/MT/WeezBlog/archives/000346.html
There is there a theme about fluency and the degree to which a critical language for talking about multimedia is not terribly wide spread. That triangulation you are looking for may reside in language expressed in a given medium and expressed about in another medium about a given medium (aka as expertise of the appreciators). The existence of such languages surely affects the temporality of the experience.

How different is it to speak of cricket or baseball after having played the game?



Posted by: Francois Lachance at October 1, 2003 02:47 PM |

Permalink to Comment







I'm a little off my game today because of the comment spam, but I think my phrasing in the last comment may have been a little confusing. I like the connection to Elouise's discussion of "fluency," and I think that's where my struggles with this paper exist. I'm completely aware of the fact that the language I choose for talking about blog entries (whether I draw it from film, TV, the "digital") will certainly affect how I articulate the temporality of blogging.

I think you're also right about cultural artifacts being "multitemporal." When I've talked to students about certain blogs, their experience of them is often quite different than mine. Where I've grown with a blog, reading it daily, sometimes for weeks or months, they read multiple entries at once, leading them to read a much different narrative than the one I follow. Not sure I'm making this example clear enough.

The "tools" question seems particularly pertinent in this comparison. Blogging tools are available to anyone who has regular access to a computer. Of course a blogger also has to have a certain degree of computer "literacy" as well. The kinds of TV sampling you describe might require greater technological resources.



Posted by: chuck at October 2, 2003 12:42 PM |

Permalink to Comment







I don't think you were off your game. It was just a ploy to see if I would come back and engage -- especially since I have been thematizing the productivity of the interval (interaction followed by immersion followed by interaction) in a comment to an entry by Jason Rhody
http://misc.wordherders.net/archives/000884.html

Why not approach the paper as an interview with Elouise or Jason? Do like the sciences and share a publication credit.

For an example see what Stephen Ramsey and Geoffrey Rockwell did recently (June 6, 2003):
http://cantor.english.uga.edu/docs/u4.3.pdf




Posted by: Francois Lachance at October 2, 2003 03:46 PM |

Permalink to Comment







I definitely *like* the idea of writing a blog paper collaboratively. It makes more sense in many ways (especially given the collaborative nature of thinking in/through blogs), but I'll probably do this one alone since I have a fairly imminent deadline, and I'm not good at managing such things.

I wrote this comment off the cuff, so I'll have to go back and look at the exchange with Jason (immersion/interval sounds right up my alley) and the Ramsey/Rockwell paper....



Posted by: chuck at October 2, 2003 06:05 PM |

7:48 PM

 
October 21, 2003
The Future of Blogging
I've been planning to reflect on some of the questions raised by the Perseus White Papers' The Blogging Iceberg, in part because I think it speaks to some of the concerns I want to address in my "Blogging and the Everyday" paper, which is constantly shifting focus as I continue to write, read, and reflect. Warning: random thoughts ahead. I mostly wanted to collect some links to some really interesting posts.

I won't address the many critiques of Perseus' methodology, other than to note that by ignoring non-hosted blogs, I'd guess that any information about user demographics would be considerably skewed (as would the percentage of abandoned blogs). I'm intrigued by the growth rate, although I think that is also hard to predict, especially given the unpredictable role that AOL blogging tools will have, but more than anything, the survey indicates to me the extreme difficulty of making too many quantitative claims about blogging.

Instead, I'm more intrigued by what blogs are doing (how people are "using" or understanding them) and what they will or may become. In that regard, I'm especially intrigued by David Weinberger's discussion of the future of blogging. I think he's probably right that distinctions between high traffic bloggers and "the rest of the world" (note: Clay Shirky's discussion is highly relevant here) will probably increase to the point that their sites will begin to look less like blogs and more like something else, a perpetually updated op-ed page, perhaps. Now that I've gone back to re-read Liz's post about this topic on Many-to-Many, I think she articulates what I'm trying to say quite well:

The big difference, to me, is that when you’re at the top of the “power law curve,” you’re in broadcast mode. When you’re at the tail end, you’re in private diary mode. But in the middle, that’s where the interlinking and dialog and community-forming are happening. Those are very different modes of communication.
In my experience, my status (presumably somewhere in the middle) has provided me with the "dialog" and "community forming" that Liz describes, and now that I think about it, that experience considerably regulates my interpretation of blogging as a medium.


Unlike other observers, I'm not sure how much more popular blogs will become, in part for some of the reasons that Alex Halavias describes: (1) blogging takes time away from other forms of communication, work, and entertainment; (2) only a limited number of people write for pleasure (and many of those people prefer not to write publicly or choose other mediums for their writing); and (3) blogging is still intimidating for many non-techies, something I didn't initially realize when I incorporated blogging into my freshman composition course this semester.

I'm somewhat optimistic that blogs may be of "increasing value" to democracy, but I don't think this value will necessarily be recognizable in campaign blogs (although I think campaign blogs are very important) as much as it is in blogs as alternative media or media filters. Blogs that create coalitions of citizens invested in various political issues (copyright law, anti-war protests) seem to have more potential in creating long-term alliances.

As an aside, I also found the discussion on aldon of the research on "blogging as a genre" intriguing, but I'm still tempted to reserve the term medium to describe the blog itself (or the various "levels" of blogs) and genre to describe various types of blogs (academic, personal, journalism, political, etc). Obviously most (perhaps all) blogs don't fit into such discrete categories, and I have mixed feelings about categorizing blogs, anyway.

I believe that my project will be operating in this mid-level space, for the most part, the spaces where academic bloggers are making connections, exchanging ideas, and sharing experiences. Now what any of this has to do with original topic, blogging and the everyday, I'm not sure...

Posted by chuck at October 21, 2003 03:01 PM | TrackBack

Comments





Chuck,
Your title seems to recall Michel de Certeau
_The Practice of Everyday Life_. Was that the intent? Seems plausible since you end with a typology of practices:

- making connections
- exchanging ideas
- sharing experiences

Reminds me a bit of George's categories of moves in the game of conversation:
http://ghw.wordherders.net/archives/000371.html

I like the way you sandwich exchange between connection making and experience sharing. The making of connections can be done solo. The sharing of experience is ab ovo a solo action (the autobiographical entry/comment). Both of these (story telling, sharing, and connection making, linking)do not require the structure of interpellation and acknowledgment for their completion. The exchange in a sense marks a type of dialogue where the bloggers are likely to tip into the spiral of an economy of the gift and experience vertigo. It is a moment that may become emulated in other social and discursive spaces. I suspect the formula "in doing X you helped me do Y" will catch on. Imagine a generation raised on feedback loops of such civility.



Posted by: Francois Lachance at October 21, 2003 04:59 PM |

Permalink to Comment







I didn't intend the title to echo de Certeau's, although I was certainly aware of his book. I've been skimming it over the last few weeks, though, just to see what he's doing with the concept of the "everyday."

My title was intended to bring Benjamin's treatment of "the everyday" into relief, drawing from Peter Osborne's reading of him in _The Politics of Time._

I like that you break down each "move" that I described into a discrete activity (the comparison to George is unexpected, but I think it works). I was using the terms in a far more general sense, and it's useful to see the specific implications of them.

I'd still suggest that sharing experiences--in the best sense--should be understood as a reciprocal act. I don't feel like I can share "an experience" unless someone gives back/has already given back.

I found it interesting that you transform "exchange" (which in a classical economy usually implies *unequal* exchange) into exchange as giving, but I have experienced the latter several times (Liz's entry bringing together Weez's thread on narrative, for example).

Glad you reminded me to go back to de Certeau!



Posted by: chuck at October 21, 2003 11:08 PM |

Permalink to Comment







I had that tonic ironic reading of "share" -- the popular culture connotations of the social-worked to nth degree term where sharing is often a power ploy. I also realize that I read "experience" as the "narration of an experience" i.e. I had reified. Sharing stories aligns with the other products: ideas and connections.

I was attempting to locate the moments of reciprocity in the space occupied by many many non-reciprocal gestures. I think the way the technology has been taken up in the culture of blogging there is on the side of the "call" or invitation the possibility of articulating links and talking story. On the side of the response, there is an intriguing triangulation: readers witnessing the interlocutors acknowledging each other and readers wondering if the connection between interlocutors also continues elsewhere via face to face encounters or private email. This state of unknowing allows, at least allows me, to relish the secondariness of commentary, that is to openly move from observation to speculation. [I see or sense X and wonder if it may be related to Y]. It is the very possibility of so easily partioning and repartioning the discursive space (by timed entry and by multiplication of interlocutory personna) that produces what to me is a renewed civility that favours the politeness of pointing.




Posted by: Francois Lachance at October 22, 2003 12:12 PM |


7:46 PM

Monday, June 23, 2003  

Once You Use MT, Everything Else is, Well, Empty

I've decided to follow the pack, so to speak, and participate in the blog collective Wordherders. The major benefits include the cool opportunity to particiapte in a collective of other academic bloggers and to use the far more flexible blogging program, Moveable Type. I'm in the process of transferring archives (and hopefully comments) to my new home. All new entries will be posted to my MT account, which you can find at http://chutry.wordherders.net/. Please change your bookmarks and I hope you enjoy the new blog. Thanks to Jason for making Wordherderes work!

1:27 AM

Wednesday, June 18, 2003  

Quirks

Okay, my sense of righteous indignation has been tapped (probably because of spending a little too much time in my apartment). The House recently voted to permanently end estate taxes in 2013. According to Republican Dennis Hastert, the repeal protects typical American families, you know all those families who have estates in the top 1.5 percent of the U.S. population. The result is that the Republicans are stealing, I mean, reducing revenue by $162 billion through 2013, you know all that useless revenue that goes to unnecessary programs like Head Start, Americorps, and even Homeland Security. Fortunately, the bill isn't likely to pass the Senate. According to the AP story,

A law passed in 2001 eliminates the tax in 2010, only to resurrect it a year later, a quirk forced by Senate rules designed to prevent lawmakers from deepening budget deficits.
Wow, imagine having rules about budget deficits. How quirky can you get? Next thing you know, we might get really quirky and go back to the responsibility of the Clinton administration when having a budget surplus was considered economically beneficial. But that's just me; I'm kind of quirky that way. Okay, I feel a little bit better now.

4:39 PM

Tuesday, June 17, 2003  

The Man Comes Around

Inspired by George's entry on new music and needing to break free from my apartment for a few minutes, I walked up to Wuxtry to buy a couple of CDs. Unlike George, I was lucky enough to find the CDs I wanted, the White Stripes' self-titled 2002 release (pretty rockin' so far) and Johnny Cash's The Man Comes Around, his most recent American/Lost Highway recording.

I've been planning to get the Cash CD for a couple of months, but I don't get to record stores very often. I really enjoy the new music he has been producing for the last five years with producer Rick Rubin; their interpretation of songs by other artists is usually interesting and sometimes quite powerful (especially their recording of "One" by U2). Speaking of covers, I just got to the White Stripes' version of "One More Cup of Coffee," and it really works; I'm not sure I would've thought it, but I like it.

I'll have to go back and try to catch some of the Protest Records songs that George mentions. Alas, my modem is way too slow.

Wed. 6/18 Update: The White Stripes are playing a free concert by the big granite rock just outside the Perimeter. I'm thinking about going. Anyone interested?

Update Part II: I didn't realize the local commercial radio station sponsoring the concert was referring to the event as the "Big Rock." I just didn't mention the big granite rock's more common name because said slab of granite serves as a memorial for non-Union men from a war that took place during the mid-nineteenth century, and mentioning the slab of granite by name might trip up advertisements for products I don't like.

5:52 PM

 

Virtual Participation

Because my car is now officially dead (I may have a replacement, a 1989 Camry, in a week or so), I've been more or less trapped in my apartment. Even though MARTA (the Atlanta mass transit service) claims to be "Smarta," it's not terribly convenient and the busses don't run after 11PM, making it hard to catch late movies. One of the results of this immobility has been the inability to get out and participate in town halls and protests like I normally would. I have--for nearly a year--participated in TrueMajority and Moveon.org's online petition activities and knew several others who were involved in the phone blitz to express their disagreement with the recent war against Iraq. I know these grassroots uses of the Internet are nothing new (I've been on the ACLU list for a while), but they do introduce some interesting questions. On the one hand, a small amount of labor can make a lot of noise, as the recent anti-war and anti-deregulation activism suggest. It also allows people who are either immobile or busy to sustain political participation without having to physically attend a rally or event at a certain time or place. On the other hand, I do think there is tremendous value in the extra commitment required for attending a rally or some other public event. I've usually felt more rewarded by my involvement in the town halls and rallies that I attended than by my emails and faxes to various public figures. I think my question may be why I'm privileging this physical, embodied participation over online participation. In both cases, I am "sending a message" about my politics. With my online participation, I often get feedback from my Representatives and Senators in letters (I averaged about one every other day in Illinois).

I didn't really intend to take this direction with this entry. I'm more interested in thinking about how these online grassroots organizations change the political landscape, if at all. An organization like Moveon.org has definitely grown quickly, enabled in large part by the "connectedness" of the Web, the potential for information to spread very quickly to a large audience. I'm interested to see what they'll be able to do long-term with the collective they have organized.

1:11 PM

Monday, June 16, 2003  

Mezza, a Movie, and a Moth

Finally had a chance to go back to Mezza, a wonderful Lebanese restaurant in the Oak Grove neighborhood. I went originally a few months ago, and I've been craving it ever since. It's a tapas style restaurant and S and I ordered falafel, fried eggplant (which I really like--the tahini gives it a terrific kick), chicken shawarma, and beef stuffed grape leaves. It's one of the best meals I've had in a long time (and, yes, I know I said that last week after I went to Mambo--I've been eating very well lately).

After Mezza, S and I went to see The Man on the Train, the latest film by Patrice Leconte, who also directed The Widow of St. Pierre and Girl on the Bridge. In Man, I really enjoyed the dynamic between the two male leads, played by the popular French actors, Jean Rochefort (the planned lead in Terry Gilliam's doomed attempt to film Quixote, documented in Lost in LaMancha) and Johnny Hallyday. The plot begins with Milan (Hallyday) arriving by train to a small town where he is planning to rob a bank. Because Milan has no place to stay, he crashes with retired poetry teacher, Manesquier (Rochefort). Both men have reached teh end of their careers, and the film focuses on the regrets they have about the lives they've led. Both men fantasize about switching places, what it might have been like to live the other's life, and in one funny sequence, Milan actually does substitute as a poetry teacher. I don't know that I have much to add about the film. It was beautifully shot, with a prominently gray palette, reflecting the overall tone of the film. It was also cool to finally get a chance to get back to the Garden Hills cinema, one of the better screening spaces in the city.

Finally, as I type this entry, my floor lamp, now located next to my office window, seems to be attracting a moth. Not much to add there; I just liked the alliteration.

1:17 AM

Saturday, June 14, 2003  

Virilio and Marker

I've been a lazy blogger lately, and I am feeling a little guilty about it. For the most part, I've been trying to work through some ideas for a couple of articles I'm trying to finish. I'm most excited about my paper on Chris Marker's Sans soleil, especially after revisiting Manovich's The Language of New Media, especially because his notion of a "database film" so clearly applies to Marker's postmodern update of many of Dziga Vertov's techniques for seeing and thinking through cinema.

The connection I'm working through right now is a passing reference Manovich makes to Paul Virilio's book, War and Cinema. Manovich writes:

Virilio went on to suggest that, wheras space was the main category of the nineteenth century, the main category of the twentieth was time.
In Sans soleil (released in 1982), Marker, through the persona of Sandor Krasna, makes an almost identical observation; in fact the phrasing is nearly identical. I'm wondering if anyone out there might know the history of this observation or if there is any kind of relationship between Marker and Virilio beyond the fact that they likely know the other's work. There's certainly an interesting connection to be developed here, specifically in terms of their politics, their questions about how our technologies affect the way that we live in the world.


1:23 PM

Monday, June 09, 2003  

David Bowie at the Drive-In

Went to see Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars at the Starlight Six Drive-In last night, after a great dinner at Mambo (scroll down for a review), a terrific Cuban restaurant in the Highlands. The screening of Ziggy Stardust, directed by D. A. Pennebaker was part of the Atlanta Film Festival, which started this weekend and runs throughout the week (I might be seeing a lot of movies over the next few days!).

I had never been to a drive-in movie before, and it was a fascinating experience. I can certainly see the appeal of watching a movie on a giant screen in the great outdoors, especially with the nice, cool late spring weather. Ziggy Stardust also seems like the perfect drive-in type of movie, with the nostalgia for the 1970s "innocence" meshing with the nostalgia for the past when drive-ins were far more common. It was also striking how minimal the pyrotechnics were for the Ziggy Stardust concert tour, especially when compared to more recent "hypermediated" concerts by artists such as U2, which feature fireworks, light shows, and video screens.

There was one surreal moment when I glanced in my rearview mirror and saw a scene from The Matrix Reloaded (which I still haven't seen) being projected on a screen directly behind my car. The deep focus shot, of a series of doorways opening into an infinite regress of rooms, was a pretty cool one, but it was completely trippy to glance into the mirror while listening to Bowie's Ziggy Stardust evoking the future of "space travel" in 1973 while singing "Ground Control to Major Tom" in 1973 and seeing a "present" image of the future of an infinitely deeper cyberworld in my car's rearview mirror (at a drive-in theater, which at once evokes the future and the past).

12:44 PM

Saturday, June 07, 2003  

Rainy Day in Georgia

It's raining here in Atlanta, which probably means this afternoon's peace rally starting Grant Park will not be as well attended as it might be otherwise. I'm unable to attend due to a family commitment, but just wanted to extend my digitally expressed support. With the rainy weather contributing to my laziness, I've been touring the blogosphere and wanted to metion a couple of highlights:

Michael Bérubé's blog is always an entertaining and insightful read. In a May 31 entry (no permalinks, so just scroll down), Bérubé compiled a list of quotations from Republican leaders and military figures on WMD. Pretty compelling stuff. I've always found Bérubé's work compelling, especially his analysis of working conditions within the university system in books such as The Employment of English.

Recent entries by Jason and Matt about nostalgia have also been quite interesting. I was especially compelled by Jason's questions about the future of some online games, such as Ultima Online:

I often think about the future of these games - what happens when they cease to be profitable? What will we make of the ruins of these worlds, if at some point we recover them? Or will gamers simply continue their quests on their own, running hacked code on pieced-together hardware? Will people figure out a way to save their character, frozen in an odd stasis, world-less?
The image of a "digital" world in ruins is a compelling one, somewhat hard to imagine given the capacity of permanent storage, the fact that digital code doesn't deteriorate. Of course, the technologies change, and that produces the "outmodedness" that we might ascribe to text-only protocols.

12:01 PM

Thursday, June 05, 2003  

Jog Blog

I've started jogging again, and I'd forgotten how much I enjoy it. I'm still out of shape, but I live in a great residential neighborhood in North Decatur with lots of trees, and in the later part of the evening, very few cars, a rarity in Atlanta. Jogging is one of the few activities where I find myself completely in the moment, able to forget the rest of the world for just a few minutes, and simply focus on the road ahead. It's also one of the few moments that I'm completely "disconnected:" no phone, no internet, no television, no music. In fact, this lack of connection seems to be an essential part of the activity for me. Even if I owned a Walkman, I'm certain that I wouldn't use it when I'm jogging. I think I'm trying to negotiate some descriptions I've read lately of joggers as examples of "cyborgs," with their Walkmen, carefully designed running shoes, and whatnot. Now, of course I wear running shoes (Asics), but in my experience, describing jogging in terms of cyborgization seems foreign. I'm not sure why I'm unwilling to view jogging in that type of language, but it really does seem to overstate the ways in which bodies and machines interface.

More importantly, after jogging twice in the last three days, I'm already aware that I have more energy than before. I'm not sure why I'm mentioning these details in my blog, other than to try and seek out some accountability from my readers (whoever you are) and perhaps to find out how (or if) other people are able to maintain good exercise habits even when their schedules are very full.

1:03 AM

Wednesday, June 04, 2003  

Town Hall

I attended am invigorating town hall forum on human rights last night at First Iconium Baptist Chruch with Doreen. It was a pretty cool experience, with the Church's Gospel choir inspiring the audience and several guest speakers, including Loretta Ross, Executive Director, National Center for Human Rights Education, and Debbie Seagraves, Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia. Perhaps most importantly, we had the chance to network with a professor of public policy at Georgia Tech and we've begun making plans for trying to encourage more political dialogue on Tech's campus. He has some pretty exciting ideas, including hopes for attracting some interesting speakers to Tech's campus. It's exciting to make these connections and to become integrated into an active political community.

FYI Atlanta residents: There will be a big antiwar rally Saturday, June 7, starting at Grant Park and finishing at the Martin Luther King Center, featuring speakers including Martin King, III. Looks like a great opportunity to build the momentum even further.

9:35 PM

 

Chris Marker

I've been in research mode for the last few days, trying to finish up an article on Dark City and another on Chris Marker, specifically on Sans soleil, which partially explains the light blogging for the last few days, but in my "research" in the "periodical stacks" at my local bookshop, I came across a series of articles in Film Comment about Marker, including a rare interview translated from a March 5, 2003 issue of Libération. Unfortunately, you'll have to buy the issue to get full length articles, but if you're interested in Marker, it's worth a look, and according to one article, Criterion is planning to release Sans soleil and La jetée together on DVD. I've always been intrigued by Marker's meditations on time and memory and their relationship to technology, and this interview addresses those concerns at length. I think he may also capture why I don't like seeing movies during the afternoon:

Godard nailed it once and for all: at the cinema, you raise your eyes to the screen; in front of the television, you lower them. Then there is the role of the shutter. Out of the two hours you spend in a movie theater, you spend one of them in the dark. It's this nocturnal portion that stays with us, that fixes our memory of a film in a different way than the same film seen on television or on a monitor.
I think that "nocturnal" quality is something that conditions my film experience. To have a "night" before sunset confuses my inner clock, and I feel like I've lost an entire day if I see a movie before 9PM, especially in the summer when the days are longer.


1:26 PM

Saturday, May 31, 2003  

Salam Pax to Write for Guardian

According to reports, Salam Pax has signed to write a bi-weekly column for the Guardian. I've always found his blog reflective and informative. I'll be interested to see what he can do with a newspaper column.

11:17 AM

Friday, May 30, 2003  

Monopoly or Democracy?

Ted Turner makes one of the strongest arguments I've seen in opposition to further deregulation of the media:

Large media corporations are far more profit-focused and risk-averse. They sometimes confuse short-term profits and long-term value. They kill local programming because it's expensive, and they push national programming because it's cheap -- even if it runs counter to local interests and community values. For a corporation to launch a new idea, you have to get the backing of executives who are obsessed with quarterly earnings and afraid of being fired for an idea that fails. They often prefer to sit on the sidelines waiting to buy the businesses or imitate the models of the risk-takers who succeed. (Two large media corporations turned down my invitation to invest in the launch of CNN.)

That's an understandable approach for a corporation -- but for a society, it's like overfishing the oceans. When the smaller businesses are gone, where will the new ideas come from? Nor does this trend bode well for new ideas in our democracy -- ideas that come only from diverse news and vigorous reporting. Under the new rules, there will be more consolidation and more news sharing. That means laying off reporters or, in other words, downsizing the workforce that helps us see our problems and makes us think about solutions. Even more troubling are the warning signs that large media corporations -- with massive market power -- could abuse that power by slanting news coverage in ways that serve their political or financial interests. There is always the danger that news organizations can push positive stories to gain friends in government, or unleash negative stories on artists, activists or politicians who cross them, or tell their audiences only the news that confirms entrenched views. But the danger is greater when there are no competitors to air the side of the story the corporation wants to ignore.
I know I've written about this issue several times recently, but I believe Michael Copps' assertion that it's possibly the most important domestic policy issue facing our country right now.

12:50 PM

Thursday, May 29, 2003  

Say, Didn't We Just Destroy Iraq...

Because their leader was guilty of torturing and killing his own citizens? Didn't we also support once that leader with money and arms because it supported our "interests?" This Guardian story contains some pretty horrific images. According to British reports, two prisoners were boiled to death, and according to the State Department's website, torture in Uzbekistan is a "routine investigation technique." And yet, "we" gave Uzbekistan, and President Islam Karimov, $500 million last year because of its strategic location and Karimov's use of force against Islamists.

While I'm thinking about it, didn't we go after that leader because his weapons of mass destruction posed an imminent threat against "our" safety? Actually, this Philadelphia Inquirer editorial is pretty powerful in its critique of Bush. The author, Mark Bowden, points out that Bush's case for war was primarily based on WMD:

I trusted Bush, and unless something big develops on the weapons front in Iraq soon, it appears as though I was fooled by him. Perhaps he himself was taken in by his intelligence and military advisers. If so, he ought to be angry as hell, because ultimately he bears the responsibility.
If more people who supported the war demonstrate this type of reflection, maybe the hawks will be accountable for their actions, at least in the voting booths in 2004.

12:32 AM

Wednesday, May 28, 2003  

Random Wednesday Post

Just a couple of interestng items that crossed my path in the last few minutes:
  • L sent me a link to this interesting satire recently discussed in the Washington Post. Perhaps most disturbing is the fact that the author of the site has had dozens of serious inquiries. The FAQ page and the "prices" page are especially entertaining.

  • From Invisible Adjunct, the Time Travel Fantasy Game, in which she asks the great question, "If you could travel back to any time and place of your choosing, where would you go and with whom would you like to have dinner?" Given the subject of my dissertation, my temptation is to suggest a high level of "theoretical sophistication" already exists within this question. Implied within are all kinds of political and ideological considerations as well as an interesting consideration of the "frames" with which we "read" the past. By the way, I chose Orson Welles during the making of Citizen Kane for my dinner with the past, but now I'm thinking that the dinner party when Mary Shelley began telling the story that would become Frankenstein might be pretty cool.

  • Update: For dinner tonight I had the best New York style pizza I've had in the five years since I ate at Mama Teresa's in Ithaca, NY. Johnny's in Decatur makes a great cheese slice.

  • Update II: Tonight's student film screenings at the Eyedrum were a lot of fun. Lots of talented, young filmmakers here in town. Student film screenings take place on the last Wednesday of every month. One film by a group of Clark Atlanta students, Sydney and Shelley, was beautifully done, especially the editing between the two main characters who were talking on the telephone during the majority of the film. Really terrific sense of narrative progression and pacing, and my feeling is that the film could possibly be expanded into a feature length project.

2:04 PM

 

3D Movies Are Making a Comeback

According to a Wired online story, James "King of the World" Cameron announced at the Large Format Cinema Association conference that he is planning a high-definition, 3-D digital feature (no details on the script, but some rumors have him eyeing a plot based on a manned mssion to Mars, a plot that didn't work out very well for Brian DePalma or John Carpenter). In the same article, Cameron pretty much dances on the grave of the photomechanical process:

"I don't see a need for 35-mm film based on what I've seen over the last few years," he said. "Long term, it's all going to go digital."
I have to admit that I have some mixed feelings here. I hate to see celluloid disappearing (which places me in the unexpected position of being allied with Steven Spielberg among others) because I really do think that film itself--as a material artifact unlike digital--has properties that digital technologies lack. I'm also perfectly aware that digital technologies can do some amazing things, including many things that are unavailble to celluloid. I'll definitely be interested to see how Cameron renders his 3D images. The big question here, though, is definitely immersion, the attempt to create a completely realistic world, one that surpasses cinema's capacity for mimesis. Of course, one of the things I value most about cinema is the constant reference to its own artificiality as a medium. Most importantly, I'm keeping my fingers crossed that Cameron finds a better script this time around.

FYI Atlanta readers: For a much different film experience, wander down to the Eyedrum tonight at 8PM for the monthly student film screenings. It's a cool little venue and a great way to support the local film community.

12:55 PM

 

Man Without a Past

Went to see Aki Kaurismäki's Man Without a Past tonight at the Plaza. Past is a challenging film to describe: it focuses on a man who is beaten so severly by a group of muggers that he develops amnesia. The man then adapts to his new situation, moving into a small apartment (essentially little more than a shed) and taking a job with the Salvation Army. Undeterred by his condition, the man develops friendships in his new community. I'm also struggling to wrap any kind of interpretation around the film. Despite the noirish trappings of the title and the narrative about amnesia, this film has little in common with film noir--the bright palette and the absence of any real detective plot seem to work against that interpretation. It was certainly an entertaining film, full of the deadpan humor I've come to associate with Jim Jarmusch (who is a big admirer of the director). There's also a clear identification with the homeless and dispossessed people of Helsinki's slums, as J. Hoberman (one of my favorite film critics) points out, but more than anything the film struck me and Doreen as incredibly "ethical," in the sense of regarding others with dignity, recognizing the humanity in other people, no matter their condition.

Hoberman also adds some important political context, notably that a Salvation Army employee who reports that she used to be a singer actually was a famous Finnish musician, and her song mourns the annexation of a Finnish province by the USSR in the 1950s. Hoberman also reports that Kaurismäki has acted in solidarity with the "State Department-banned" Iranian filmmaker, Abbas Kiarostami, in boycotting the the New York Film Festival and skipped the Oscars because of US-UK military action in Iraq.

1:02 AM

Sunday, May 25, 2003  

Emergence

After Matt Kirschenbaum's enthusiastic mention of Steven Johnson's Emergence, I've been immersed in his discussion of "organized complexity," the ways in which complex behaviors can emerge from relatively simple rules. So far I've been most intrigued by his discussion of Jane Jacobs' The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Because I had read Jacobs through a different lens, I failed to recognize her appropriation of complexity theory to explain how cities operate--and how we can learn about the functioning of cities on the macro-level from "street-level" interactions. I haven't finished the book yet (I'm also revising some articles, including my paper on Dark City), but I'm definitely intrigued by the discussion of complexity and urban space (and the relationship to complexity in software). Within "cyberfilms" (The Matrix, Dark City, Blade Runner, and The Thirteenth Floor), the setting is almost invariably urban (Cronenberg's eXistenZ is the only exception I can think of), which leads me to think this connection is more than accidental. In addition, recent alternate reality films (Run Lola Run, Sliding Doors, and Me Myself I) also seem to have specifically urban settings (Berlin, London, and Sydney). I certainly recognized the importance of chaos theory (loosely applied) to the logic of these films, but I don't think I really "got" the connection between cities and emergence. These connections seem very important to me, and I think Johnson's book is leading me in the right direction, but I'm still sorting out some of these ideas. I'm also trying to think about how film--an incredibly linear medium in its most material definition--might fit into these concerns.

8:14 PM

Saturday, May 24, 2003  

The Thirteenth Floor

[Spoliers ahead] I rewatched The Thirteenth Floor the other night. It's one of my favorite "cyberthrillers," even if it's slightly flawed. The 1937 Los Angeles VR world, for example, really seems to open up the possibility of doing something more interesting with the detective story and especially with film noir (although noir is, of course, more of a post-war phenomenon). The detective story, especially in its noir incarnation, seems to fit pretty well against the cyberthriller, especially as characters search for certainty. I also like how the film treats each character's realization that they are living in a simulated reality.

Like most cyberthrillers, I think The Thirteenth Floor cheats a little at the end after the main character (played by Craig Bierko) discovers that he is living in a simulated 1990s in that the film seems to take for granted the idea that the "2024 world" he returns to is real and not another simulation. After all, the only objects that ground Donald in 2024 are the assertions of one his programmers and a newspaper with a June 2024 date on it (whether paper newspapers will actually exist in 2024 seems an entirely different question). On the whole, the film fits pretty well within some of the issues I'm wanting to address in terms of how "time travel" functions within cinematic narratives about computer technologies. On the other hand, the film made me feel incredibly paranoid the other night for reasons I can't really explain. Of course, it could have been those two extra cups of coffee.

10:16 PM

 

Wag the Blog

One of my former students alerted me to a FoxNews article claiming that Bill Clinton may be joining the realm of bloggers. As much as I hate Fox, this is interesting news. I also have to give credit to one of the commenters on this blog the title to this entry. Stay tuned on the Bill Clinton story.

9:31 PM

Friday, May 23, 2003  

Dynamics of a Blogosphere Story

Reading Scott Rosenberg today (note: it's a Salon.com blog, so I'm not sure about access for non-subscribers), I came across two interesting stories about online journalism, including one focusing on the role of blogging in creating a new kind of news story: Microdoc News has an interesting article arguing that the "blogosphere stories" develop following a specific pattern. I have some reservations abvout the article because I'm a little suspicious of quantitative analyses that reduce complex phenomena into simple formulas. They also reduce the diverse set of practices associated with blogging to a specific type of blog: commenting on news stories and then responding to those comments. My sense is that their research process seems somewhat skewed when they comment,

A blogosphere story that gets branded with a keyword, like "googlewashed" or "second superpower" is observable in total through searching in Google on that word.
Despite this disagreement, I think the article does highlight some of the key differences between news blogs and mainstream media:

Perhaps the last conclusions we came to in this study is that blogs cannot be read in isolation from each other. Blog stories are understood and appreciated in aggregate and not in isolation. On the other hand, mainstream media stories tend to be read in isolation rather than read and compared.

In total, Microdoc News believes blogging to be a radically different world than that of mainstream media.
I've been thinking about these distinctions quite a bit lately (especially during the war), and I'm considering proposing a panel for the SCMS (Society for Cinema and Media Studies) conference on blogging and the new journalism (or something like that). If anyone is interested let me know, and I'll take a closer look at the proposed conference theme, "Mediating Tomorrow's History: Live Coverage and Documentary in the Digital Era," and try to put something together.

The other story focuses on a progressive grassroots online journalism project in South Korea started by Oh Yeon-Ho. His OhMy News actively solicits citizen reporters and publishes over 70% of submitted articles, subverting South Korea's relatively strict hierarchy between news reporter and audience. The project is largely credited with helping elect the current South Korean president who ran on a reformist platform and acts as an alternative voice to South Korea's largely conservative press. It also takes advantage of South Korea's status as one of the most wired nations in the world. Ironically, Oh developed his grassroots chops while studying under Pat Robertson at Regent University who has fueled his own media movement in response to what conservatives have continually identified as the liberal mainstream media. I like this summation of Oh's project:

The easy coexistence of the amateurs and professionals will, soon enough, seem natural. Publications like OhmyNews will pop up everywhere, because they make sense, combining the best of old and new journalistic forms.

OhmyNews is an experiment in tomorrow. So far, it's looking like a brilliant one.
Again, if anyone's interested in getting together on an SCMS panel about blogging (or digital media) and "new journalism," let me know in the comments or email me.



11:11 AM

Wednesday, May 21, 2003  

Media and Democracy Part II

(Scroll down for a discussion of WiFi for homeless people)

There was a solid turnout of approximately 500-600 people (despite the rain) for the discussion of the deregulation policy under consideration by the FCC. The event was sponsored by community radio station WRFG 89.3. Panelists included the two Democratic FCC commissioners who plan to vote against deregulation, Micael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein; Vanderbilt law professor, Christopher Yoo; Democracy Now producer, Amy Goodman; Creative Loafing editor, John Sugg; and several local politicians (more about them later). You may be able to hear a broadcast of this forum on your local NPR station tomorrow (or if you're fortunate enough to have a Pacifica station in your community, on Democracy Now).

At stake is unprecedented deregulation of media ownership and the potential silencing of many diverse and dissenting points of view in what Commissioner Copps called "the most important domestic policy issue" facing the United States right now. Copps warned that Commission chairperson, Michael Powell, is "racing" to get this legislation passed, and in fact, a vote is due on policy changes on June 2. I'd like to encourage my readers to contact each member of the FCC board (update: I had the wrong URL here, but the problem is now fixed) and to express your disagreement with further deregulation. You can also contact your representatives or Senators in Congress and encourage them to put pressure on the FCC to either delay this vote or to decide against deregulation.

Copps warned against the dangers of deregulation, specifically citing the changes in ownership of commerical media since the 1996 Telecommunications Act. He noted that there are now 34.3% fewer radio station owners, that 3 companies own 60% of all radio stations, 5 companies own 67% of all television stations and these 5 companies own 90% of the top 50 cable channels, but with this new legislation, one company could essentially dominate the American media landscape. Copps also addressed one of the major arguments supporting relaxing media regulation, the claim that the Internet changes everything. While I certainly value the Internet as a means of disseminating information, it is important to remember that only a limited number of people have internet access and that the top twenty news sources online are owned by major media corporations. Already brokers are salivating over the hundreds of TV and radio stations that will be sold under the new legislation. As Copps pointed out, these changes will have lasting implications: "How do you put the genie back into the bottle?" Adelstein later added that this legislation has the potential to create a "21st-century Citizen Kane." Of course we'd need Orson Welles to direct.

Copps also identified one of the major problems with the new policy changes: the fact that FCC chairman Powell has tried to hide many of these changes from the public. In fact, there has been only one formal public meeting, in Richmond, VA, focusing on these changes. Adelstein and Copps have since been hitting the streets (and the airwaves) in raising public awareness of this issue. Copps noted that the FCC has already received 137,000 comments from concerned citizens, with about 40-50 total people supporting deregulation. A broad coalition of organizations also have fought against media concentration, on both sides of the political spectrum (including a certain organization for which the star of Planet of the Apes once served as president).

Law professor Christopher Yoo explained the basics of the planned deregulation, and I'll do my best to paraphrase these changes. He noted that the number of television stations has tripled since the 1970s, and added that the average cable subscriber now has access to an average of 55 TV stations. Yoo noted that there were three major rules under scrutiny:

  • Local ownership limits within media: The original rule prevented owning more than one radio station in a city. Currently there is a tiered approach allowing comapnies to own anywhere from 4-8 radio stations depending on the size of the city and up to two TV stations (if there are 8 or more TV stations in that city).

  • Local ownership limits across media: The original rule "limited owners to one AM, FM, or television station." Currently companies may own 1 TV + 7 radio stations if there are more than 20 "voices" in the market. The current rule also bars ownership of a newspaper and radio station or television station in the same city (Atlanta's Cox Communications is one the 54 "grandfathered" exceptions).

  • Restrictions focused on national markets: Rule originally prohibited ownership of more than three stations nationwide. Now companies may own any numebr of stations, up to 35% of the national audience. Two companies, Fox and Viacom currently own more than 35%. Viacom also owns two major networks, CBS and UPN. One of the major changes would allow comapnies to own stations totalling up to 45% of the national audience.

Yoo noted that these rules have come under reconsideration due to inconsistencies, specifically the slippage between "voices" and stations in the rules against "cross-ownership." He also noted that the FCC discussion is not just about deregulation, but also about questions regarding the emergence of new media and what he called "the economics of information," the challenges facing many media outlets in disseminating news, offering one interesting example where regulation ended up preventing a newsppaer competing the Boston Globe from succeeding. Of course, my experience in Atlanta suggests the opposite, with the merger of the Atlanta Journal and Constitution reducing the quality in coverage. Naturally, many of these rules (regardless of the FCC's decisions) will be challenged in court. Unfortunately, the DC Appeals Court tends to look favorably on deregulation.

Amy Goodman later added that this deregulation can have tremendously destructive consequences, noting that corporate profit frequently gets in the way of responsible journalism. She observed that according to a FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting) study, out of 393 interviews broadcast on the major networks in the week leading up to Colin Powell's UN speech, only 3 were with people opposed to the war. Dissent against the war has been relatively ignored by mainstream media, leading Goodman to refer to anti-war advocates as a "slienced majority."

She also emphasized the lack of minority voices in the mainstream media and concluded with some harsh criticism of Clear Channel's homogenization of radio broadcasts and elimination of local voices, including a case in Minot, North Dakota, where a chemical leak led to 300 people being hospitalized. When rescuers attempted to contact the local media so that they could warn listeners about potential contamination, they discovered that Clear Channel owned all five stations and that the one person who worked at the news desk was unavailable.

The meeting itself was an amazing experience, both encouraging in the sheer number of people working against deregulation and discouraging in feeling powerless to stop the deregulation steamroller. Perhaps the most exciting moment of the evening was the presence of alternative media sources and the movement toward coalition building, especially during the question and answer session at the end. People from countries including Iran, Bosnia, and Palestine, all spoke against deregulation, emphasizing their experiences in countries where media coverage is extremely limited with sometimes fatal consequences. There was also the 76-year old woman who said she couldn't sleep at night due to her anxieties regarding the direction the country is taking and said to pass the message to Michael Powell that if deregulation passes, "I'm turning the TV off." There was the young independent musician who siad she wanted to have children, but couldn't imagine raising them in a world where corporate profit is valued so highly. There were several former CNN employees who praised Ted Turner's original vision for cable news ("the little guy shaking his fist at the injustices of the world"), but left the company after AOL took over. There was an independent radio station owner from Selma, Alabama, whose broadcast towers were twice damaged or destroyed during consecutive Congressional elections.

WiFi and the Homeless: There were also coalitions and alliances formed, inlcuing a powerful connection that would allow greater Internet access to Atlanta's homeless population. One woman spoke about her role in working with Atlanta's homeless population, and Jabari Simama, the Executive Director of Atlanta's Office of Community Technology, mentioned a project supported by the city, a "Technology Bus" that brings computers, complete with WiFi Internet access, to Atlanta's poor and homeless population. The bus was parked in front of the rally, and it looked to have about ten relatively high-speed computers available for public use. My feeling is that this is one really cool use of technology, especially WiFi. For the city's poor population, applying for jobs, searching for jobs, sending resumes, researching apartments, is much more difficult becuase of the lack of access to technology. It's a great opportunity to help bridge the so-called "digital divide." It's projects like these that give me hope that independent media will not only survive but will flourish.

11:08 PM

Tuesday, May 20, 2003  

Media and Democracy

FYI, Atlanta readers: There will be a major public discussion about the deregulation of media ownership at Glenn Memorial Chapel on the campus of Emory University tomorrow night, May 21, at 6 PM. Planned guests include Jon Lewis, Cynthia McKinney, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now, and Jonathan Adelstein of the FCC.

The event is open to the public, and guests are invited to submit written statements about their concerns with this new policy regarding media ownership. This meeting may be the last public discussion of these proposed changes in FCC guidelines before the FCC meets in Washington, DC, on June 2nd. One of the major areas of contention is the elimination of the ban on "cross ownership," allowing companies to own local newspapers and TV and radio stations in the same market. Like many people who either support or participate in independent media, I worry that cross ownership will significantly reduce the diversity of our nation's media. This looks like an important event for conveying our concerns about this potentially groundbreaking deregulation.

3:52 PM

 

Say It Ain't So, Joss. Say It Ain't So

Final episode of Buffy tonight. Salon has a good article about the series and an interview with series creator Joss Whedon.

12:21 PM

 

Dating a Blogger

George mentions this New York Times article about "Dating a Blogger." It's an interesting little article about some of the risks involved in blogging about social relationships:

In the rush to publish, many bloggers are running headlong into some of the problems conventionally published memoirists know too well: hurt feelings, newly wary friends and relatives, and the occasional inflamed employer.
Since I don't often blog about dating specifics, I'm not sure that I've had any experiences like the ones described in this article. Still, I find myself hesitating to write about certain events or writing about them in very cryptic ways, often avoiding details and deleting commentary. When I first started blogging, I rarely revised, but now I'm constantly going back, modifying what I've said, posting and re-posting.

I also tend to hesitate before mentioning someone by name on my blog. To what extent am I invading someone's privacy? To what extent am I revealing things that I'd rather hide? I've definitely become much more conscious of audience as a blogger than I ever was before, and to that extent, it has been a really valuable experince, something I can hopefully translate in various ways into my academic writing and into my social relationships.

1:08 AM

Monday, May 19, 2003  

Road Trip

Recovering from a long, exhausting weekend in Athens (currently college sports scandal central with multiple football players suspended for smoking pot and/or selling their championship rings on e-Bay). My car--a hardworking 1989 Mazda 929--broke down while I was just outside of Athens Friday evening, leaving me with a few unexpected hours of time to explore downtown Athens. After seeing Of Montreal at the 40 Watt Club on Friday night, I spent most of the day Saturday exploring downtown Athens, finally tracking down a new pair of Converse All Stars and then settling down to read Paul Auster's City of Glass. Glass was a good read, a nice parody of the detective novel that reminded me a lot of Borges.

11:38 AM

Thursday, May 15, 2003  

Chaos

Just watched Coline Serreau's 2001 French film, Chaos at the new Madstone Parkside 6 in Sandy Springs. Serreau, who also directed the film that, um, inspired, Three Men and a Baby, satires the complacency of French bourgeois culture through this frenetic feminist thriller. The film opens with Paul, a high-powered businessman, and Hélène, a successful attorney, rushing through their apartment for a dinner obligation. While in their car, they watch as an Algerian prostitute is being violently pursued by three men. Rather than helping her, Paul locks the doors to the car, and the couple watches as Noémie is brutally beaten, her blood smearing on their windshield (a following shot of Paul and his wife in an automatic car wash reinforces Paul's lack of concern, his ability to distance himself from the inhumane beating). Hélène, feeling guilty, goes to the hospital and begins nursing Noémie back to health. Without giving away too many details, we are given Noémie's backstory, and learn that she has essentially been forced into prostitution, in part due to her father's selling her as a wife to a wealthy, older businessman. As a film, Chaos is definitely entertaining, and the feminist critique of various forms of male privilege doesn't come across as preachy, in part due to the comic gifts of the actors playing Paul and Hélène. Check out the Village Voice and Los Angeles Times reviews.

A quick review of the Madstone Parkisde 6, since it just (re)opened as an arthouse theater a few weeks ago: it was actually a nice venue with comfortable seats and a great projection system. Not sure how long they'll be able to maintain much of an art house set-up in that they have already started subsidizing the art house screenings with blockbuster films. The snack bar is the best I've seen in Atlanta, with several coffee drinks available and a small bar. It also appeared to have a larger snack collection than the mere candy and popcorn. A few tables in the lobby provided a welcome space for a pre-movie drink. I think the theater has a lot to offer, and I hope that it can sustain itself with art house films.

12:42 AM

Wednesday, May 14, 2003  

"Put Me in, Coach"

Attended tonight's Tech-Georgia baseball game (Tech lost 10-3! Boo!) at Turner Field with my sister and a couple of friends. Despite the blow-out, it was fun to catch a college b-ball game again.

Also had the strange experience of parking in the lot where Atlanta-Fulton County Stadium used to stand. I stood precisely at home plate and looked out at the outline of the fence (with its marker commemorating Hank Aaron's record-breaking 715th home run), and it was really hard to imagine the field ever being there. I don't feel a strong allegiance to the old stadium, even though I have a lot of memories from it, but there is a strange sense of loss when the place that housed such a major athletic achievement is destroyed, and I do have some mixed feelings about the practice of building new stadiums using taxpayers' money.

"The Ted" is actually an interesting ballpark. Since I've only been there once before (for last year's heartbreaking playoff loss to the Giants), it was interesting to observe all of the amusements set up around the periphery of the stadium. Of course, since the Braves weren't playing, most of these amusements were closed, which gave the area the feel of a ghost town.

12:40 AM

 

Congratulations!

Congratulations to Jason, author of No Symbols Where None Intended, who is now the father of a baby boy, a.k.a. the "Little Man." Mother and child are "recovering nicely."


12:02 AM

Tuesday, May 13, 2003  

Downstream International Film Festival

My sister mentioned (by email) a local film festival that is currently organizing and seeking volunteers, and after my wonderful experience with the now defunct Freaky Film Festival in Champaign, I thought I'd investigate. I did some quick research, and noticed an ad in Creative Loafing for the Downstream International Film Festival. I'm not sure this is the festival that Kristen mentioned, but it looks similar in spirit to the Freaky Film Festival (lots of indpendent, experimental, and just plain quirky films).

12:49 PM

Monday, May 12, 2003  

WMD: "We Might Deceive"

The Washington Post article documenting the inability to locate any major evidence of WMD is certainly disturbing news and completely calls into question our motives for a pre-emptive war against Iraq. I'm not sure I can really add much to what other people have said, so instead of commenting further, I'm adding a quick link to Christopher Allbritton's Back in Iraq 2.0. I haven't mentioned this site in a few weeks, but throughout the war, he's offered a valuable counternarrative to the hawkish images broadcast on television. In a recent post, Allbritton expresses plans to continue his career as an independent blogger journalist and asks some important questions about the role of blogging as a new journalistic medium. There's some interesting discussion following in the comments section.

6:06 PM

Sunday, May 11, 2003  

Impossible Cinematography

Just read this month's Wired cover article on The Matrix Reloaded, and I think I'm pretty excited. The sequence they're referring to as the Burly Brawl seems relevant to my current research direction, specifically in terms of its treatment of the relationship between digital effects and identity fragmentation. I want to see the film before I comment further, but I think this sequence (from the description in Wired) could become really useful in thinking through and about digital effects. Visual effects supervisor John Galeta refers to his work in The Matrix Reloaded as "impossible cinematography." The infinite replication of Agent Smiths sounds like a stunning visual feat. Okay, I'm excited.

11:30 PM

 

I'm Going Straight to Hell, Just Like My Mama Told Me

Just took the Dante's Inferno Test after reading about it on Kieran Healy's weblog.

Here is how I matched up against all the levels:
LevelScore
Purgatory (Repenting Believers)Very Low
Level 1 - Limbo (Virtuous Non-Believers)High
Level 2 (Lustful)Very High
Level 3 (Gluttonous)Moderate
Level 4 (Prodigal and Avaricious)Moderate
Level 5 (Wrathful and Gloomy)Low
Level 6 - The City of Dis (Heretics)Very High
Level 7 (Violent)High
Level 8- the Malebolge (Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers)Moderate
Level 9 - Cocytus (Treacherous)Low


Looks like I'll be hanging out in the second level of hell with Helen of Troy and Cleopatra. I suppose there are worse places to be, but I'm a little perplexed that the test interpreted me as even moderately violent--maybe it's all those violent movies I watch?

Be like me: Take the Dante's Inferno Hell Test

3:16 PM

 
This page is powered by Blogger.